Agrosystem services: An additional terminology to better understand ecosystem services delivered by agriculture

Hubert Wiggering; Peter Weißhuhn; Benjamin Burkhard

doi:10.3097/LO.201649

Authors

Hubert Wiggering Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Eberswalder Straße 84, Müncheberg, D-15374, Germany; Institute of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Straße 24/25, Potsdam, D-14476, Germany
Peter Weißhuhn Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Eberswalder Straße 84, Müncheberg, D-15374, Germany; Institute of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Straße 24/25, Potsdam, D-14476, Germany https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1245-454X
Benjamin Burkhard Institute for Natural Resource Conservation, Kiel University, Olshausenstraße 40, Kiel, D-24098, Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3097/LO.201649

Keywords:

Agricultural ecosystem, Agro(eco)system, Agro-ecosystem, Agroecosystem, Agrosystem, Disservices, Services

Abstract

To discriminate between the contributions of ecosystems and the human subsidies to agricultural systems, we propose using an additional terminology to bring clarification into the controversial discussion about i) ecosystems versus agrosystems and ii) ecosystem services versus agrosystem services. A literature review revealed that with the exception of some very recent publications, this has not yet been sufficiently reflected, neither within the scientific nor in the policy discussion. The question remains whether to spoil the discussion with new terms again and again. We reason that it makes sense to underpin the case-specific share of agricultural inputs to the supply of agroecosystem services and to add "agro" to the terminology. We conclude, that there is a need to promote the new terminology of agrosystem services and to strengthen the use of the already established term agroecosystem services within this context. To emphasise the production patterns behind the multiple benefits agricultural systems provide to humans (commodity and non-commodity outputs) and to guarantee a reasonable weighting of related externalities in policy processes, we suggest to introduce the term agrosystem services into the discussion on ecosystem services. Agrosystem services in this context describe the anthropogenic share of agroecosystem services' generation. Agroecosystem services include multiple provisioning, regulating and cultural services from agricultural ecosystems. The inclusion of agrosystem services might accommodate the ecology-based ecosystem services concept to the specificity of managed agricultural ecosystems and therefore could be better implemented by mostly economy-driven agricultural production systems and agricultural policy.

References

Food and agriculture organization of the united nations statistics division. (2015). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations,

Our life insurance, our natural capital: An EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. (2011). Our Life Insurance, our Natural Capital: An EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020,

Albert, C., Galler, C., Hermes, J., Neuendorf, F., von Haaren, C., & Lovett, A. (2015). Applying Ecosystem Services Indicators in Landscape Planning and Management: The ES-in-Planning Framework,

Bastian, O., Haase, D., & Grunewald, K. (2012). Ecosystem properties, potentials and services - the EPPS conceptual framework and an urban application example. Ecological Indicators, 21, 7-16. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.03.014

Bills, N., & Gross, D. (2005). Sustaining multifunctional agricultural landscapes: Comparing stakeholder perspectives in new york (US) and england (UK). Land use Policy, 22(4), 313-321. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.06.001

Bonn, A., Macgregor, N., Stadler, J., Korn, H., Stiffel, S., Wolf, K., & van Dijk, N. (2014). Helping ecosystems in europe to adapt to climate change. Helping Ecosystems in Europe to Adapt to Climate Change, BfN-Skripten,

Burkhard, B., De Groot, R., Costanza, R., Seppelt, R., Jørgensen, S. E., & Potschin, M. (2012). Solutions for sustaining natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators, 21, 1-6. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.03.008

Burkhard, B., Kandziora, M., Hou, Y., & Müller, F. (2014). Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands-concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification. Landscape Online, 34(1), 1-32. doi:10.3097/LO.201434

Carpenter, S. R., DeFries, R., Dietz, T., Mooney, H. A., Polasky, S., Reid, W. V., & Scholes, R. J. (2006). Millennium ecosystem assessment: Research needs. Science, 314(5797), 257-258. doi:10.1126/science.1131946

Chee, Y. E. (2004). An ecological perspective on the valuation of ecosystem services. Biological Conservation, 120(4), 549-565. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2004.03.028

Costanza, R. (2008). Ecosystem services: Multiple classification systems are needed. Biological Conservation, 141(2), 350-352. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.12.020

Costanza, R. (2008). Natural capital. The Encyclopedia of Earth,

Costanza, R., D'Arge, R., De Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., . . . Van Den Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630), 253-260. doi:10.1038/387253a0

Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Sutton, P., van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S. J., Kubiszewski, I., . . . Turner, R. K. (2014). Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 26(1), 152-158. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002

Daily, G. C. (1997). Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems,

Daily, G. C., Polasky, S., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Pejchar, L., . . . Shallenberger, R. (2009). Ecosystem services in decision making: Time to deliver. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(1), 21-28. doi:10.1890/080025

Dale, V. H., & Polasky, S. (2007). Measures of the effects of agricultural practices on ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 64(2), 286-296. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.05.009

Diehl, K., Burkhard, B., & Jacob, K. (2016). Should the ecosystem services concept be used in european commission impact assessment? Ecological Indicators, 61, 6-17. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.07.013

Elmqvist, T., Tuvendal, M., Krishnaswamy, J., & Hylander, K. (2013). Managing trade-offs in ecosystem services. Values, payments and institutions for ecosystem management: A developing country perspective (pp. 70-89) doi:10.4337/9781781953693.00010

Fischer, A., & Eastwood, A. (2016). Coproduction of ecosystem services as human-nature interactions-an analytical framework. Land use Policy, 52, 41-50. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.004

Fisher, B., Turner, R. K., & Morling, P. (2009). Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics, 68(3), 643-653. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014

Foley, J. A., DeFries, R., Asner, G. P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S. R., . . . Snyder, P. K. (2005). Global consequences of land use. Science, 309(5734), 570-574. doi:10.1126/science.1111772

Fontana, V., Radtke, A., Bossi Fedrigotti, V., Tappeiner, U., Tasser, E., Zerbe, S., & Buchholz, T. (2013). Comparing land-use alternatives: Using the ecosystem services concept to define a multi-criteria decision analysis. Ecological Economics, 93, 128-136. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.05.007

Gasparatos, A., & Scolobig, A. (2012). Choosing the most appropriate sustainability assessment tool. Ecological Economics, 80, 1-7. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.05.005

Gebhard, C. -., Büchi, L., Liebisch, F., Sinaj, S., Ramseier, H., & Charles, R. (2013). Screening of legumes as cover crops: Nitrogen and weeds. [Beurteilung von leguminosen als gründüngungspflanzen: Stickstoff und begleitflora] Agrarforschung Schweiz, 4(9), 384-393.

Gordon, L. J., Finlayson, C. M., & Falkenmark, M. (2010). Managing water in agriculture for food production and other ecosystem services. Agricultural Water Management, 97(4), 512-519. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2009.03.017

Haines-Young, R., & Potschin, M. (2012). CICES version 4: Response to consultation. CICES Version 4: Response to Consultation,

Haines-Young, R., & Potschin, M. (2010). The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. Ecosystem Ecology: A New Synthesis, , 110-139.

Harrison, P. A., Vandewalle, M., Sykes, M. T., Berry, P. M., Bugter, R., de Bello, F., . . . Zobel, M. (2010). Identifying and prioritising services in european terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19(10), 2791-2821. doi:10.1007/s10531-010-9789-x

Helming, K., Diehl, K., Geneletti, D., & Wiggering, H. (2013). Mainstreaming ecosystem services in european policy impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 40(1), 82-87. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2013.01.004

Jarvis, D. I., Khaka, E., Pert, P. L., Thiombiano, L., & Boelee, E. (2013). Managing agroecosystem services. Managing Water and Agroecosystems for Food Security - Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture Series 10, , 124-141.

Jones, L., Norton, L., Austin, Z., Browne, A. L., Donovan, D., Emmett, B. A., . . . Willis, G. F. (2016). Stocks and flows of natural and human-derived capital in ecosystem services. Land use Policy, 52, 151-162. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.014

Kinzig, A. P., Perrings, C., Chapin III, F. S., Polasky, S., Smith, V. K., Tilman, D., & Turner II, B. L. (2011). Paying for ecosystem services - promise and peril. Science, 334(6056), 603-604. doi:10.1126/science.1210297

Klein, A. -., Vaissière, B. E., Cane, J. H., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Cunningham, S. A., Kremen, C., & Tscharntke, T. (2007). Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1608), 303-313. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3721

Koschke, L., Fürst, C., Frank, S., & Makeschin, F. (2012). A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning. Ecological Indicators, 21, 54-66. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010

Matzdorf, B., & Lorenz, J. (2010). How cost-effective are result-oriented agri-environmental measures?-an empirical analysis in germany. Land use Policy, 27(2), 535-544. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.07.011

Munda, G. (2005). "Measuring sustainability": A multi-criterion framework. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 7(1), 117-134. doi:10.1007/s10668-003-4713-0

Polasky, S., Tallis, H., & Reyers, B. (2015). Setting the bar: Standards for ecosystem services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(24), 7356-7361. doi:10.1073/pnas.1406490112

Power, A. G. (2016). Can ecosystem services contribute to food security? Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services, , 491-500.

Power, A. G. (2010). Ecosystem services and agriculture: Tradeoffs and synergies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365(1554), 2959-2971. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0143

Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Peterson, G. D., & Bennett, E. M. (2010). Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(11), 5242-5247. doi:10.1073/pnas.0907284107

Rockström, J., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L., Hoff, H., Rost, S., & Gerten, D. (2009). Future water availability for global food production: The potential of green water for increasing resilience to global change. Water Resources Research, 45(7) doi:10.1029/2007WR006767

Rost, S., Gerten, D., Hoff, H., Lucht, W., Falkenmark, M., & Rockström, J. (2009). Global potential to increase crop production through water management in rainfed agriculture. Environmental Research Letters, 4(4) doi:10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/044002

Schößer, B., Helming, K., & Wiggering, H. (2010). Assessing land use change impacts - a comparison of the sensor land use function approach with other frameworks. Journal of Land use Science, 5(2), 159-178. doi:10.1080/1747423X.2010.485727

Schröter, M., Barton, D. N., Remme, R. P., & Hein, L. (2014). Accounting for capacity and flow of ecosystem services: A conceptual model and a case study for telemark, norway. Ecological Indicators, 36, 539-551. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.018

Schröter-Schlaack, C., Albert, C., von Haaren, C., Hansjürgens, B., Krätzig, S., & Albert, I. (2016). Ökosystemleistungen in Ländlichen Räumen–Grundlage Für Menschliches Wohlergehen Und Nachhaltige Wirtschaftliche Entwicklung,

Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V., Rosales, M., & De Haan, C. (2006). Livestock's role in climate change and air pollution. Livestock's Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options,

Tscharntke, T., Klein, A. M., Kruess, A., Steffan-Dewenter, I., & Thies, C. (2005). Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - ecosystem service management. Ecology Letters, 8(8), 857-874. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x

Van Zanten, B. T., Verburg, P. H., Espinosa, M., Gomez-Y-Paloma, S., Galimberti, G., Kantelhardt, J., . . . Viaggi, D. (2014). European agricultural landscapes, common agricultural policy and ecosystem services: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 34(2), 309-325. doi:10.1007/s13593-013-0183-4

von Haaren, C., Albert, C., Barkmann, J., de Groot, R. S., Spangenberg, J. H., Schröter-Schlaack, C., & Hansjürgens, B. (2014). From explanation to application: Introducing a practice-oriented ecosystem services evaluation (PRESET) model adapted to the context of landscape planning and management. Landscape Ecology, 29(8), 1335-1346. doi:10.1007/s10980-014-0084-1

Wallace, K. J. (2007). Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions. Biological Conservation, 139(3-4), 235-246. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.015

Wiggering, H., Müller, K., Werner, A., & Helming, K. (2003). The concept of multifunctionality in sustainable land development. Sustainable Development of Multifunctional Landscapes, , 3-18.

Wüstemann, H., Albrecht, K., Matzdorf, B., & Schuler, J. (2008). Theoretische grundlagen von politiken zur förderung der multifunktionalität. Multifunktionalität-Von Der Wohlfahrtsökonomie Zu Neuen Ufern, , 58-84.

Zhang, W., Ricketts, T. H., Kremen, C., Carney, K., & Swinton, S. M. (2007). Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture. Ecological Economics, 64(2), 253-260. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.024